Share This

Google App Engine

Powered by Google App Engine

AddToAny.com/share_save

Share

share gadget

http://fcgadgets.appspot.com/spec/sharefb.xml

Facebook Badge

Loke San | Create Your Badge

PLUGINS FACEBOOK

FACEBOOK SOCIAL PLUGINS

My Blog List

ADDED TWITTER

Total Pageviews

Tuesday, September 4, 2012

John Cusack Interviews Law Professor Jonathan Turley About Obama Administration’s War On the Constitution

John Cusack Interviews Law Professor Jonathan Turley About Obama Administration’s War On the Constitution
Posted by at

1 comment:

  1. RAYLOKESeptember 4, 2012 at 12:54 PM

    OBAMA HAS POLICY ALLOWING HIM TO KILL ANY US CITIZEN

    President Obama has actually a formal policy allowing him to kill any US citizen... [Attorney General Eric Holder at Northwestern Law School] articulated the most authoritarian policy that a government can have: the right to unilaterally kill its citizens without any court order or review....The Republicans keep talking about a nonexistent death panel in national healthcare. We actually do have a death panel, and it's killing people who are healthy.... Of course, their proceedings are completely secret. The people who are put on the hit list are not informed, obviously.... The first time you're informed that you're on this list is when your car explodes, and that doesn't allow much time for due process. ... Obama has openly embraced these powers and created formal measures, an actual process for killing US citizens…. This is exactly what the framers of the Constitution told us not to do.... They created a system where no branch had enough authority to govern alone — a system of shared and balanced powers. So what Obama's doing is to rewrite the most fundamental principle of the US Constitution. The whole point of the Holder speech was that we're really good guys who take this seriously, and you can trust us. That's exactly the argument the framers rejected, the "trust me" principle of government....

    OBAMA REFUSES TO PROSECUTE WAR CRIMES

    For many civil libertarians it is impossible to vote for someone who has blocked the prosecution of war crimes. That's where you cross the Rubicon for most civil libertarians. That was a turning point for many who simply cannot to vote for someone who is accused of that type of violation. Under international law, shielding people from war-crime prosecutions is itself a form of war crime. They're both violations of international law....

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)